{"id":31126,"date":"2026-03-17T14:12:29","date_gmt":"2026-03-17T18:12:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lequotidien509.com\/?p=31126"},"modified":"2026-03-17T14:20:38","modified_gmt":"2026-03-17T18:20:38","slug":"jovenel-moise-assassination-no-dna-or-fingerprints-collected-fbi-and-haitian-authorities-exposed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lequotidien509.com\/en\/jovenel-moise-assassination-no-dna-or-fingerprints-collected-fbi-and-haitian-authorities-exposed\/","title":{"rendered":"Jovenel Mo\u00efse Assassination: No DNA or Fingerprints Collected, FBI and Haitian Authorities Exposed"},"content":{"rendered":"

March 17, 2026. <\/strong>In any homicide investigation, the first fundamental rule is to immediately secure the crime scene. In the case of Jovenel Mo\u00efse, however, this basic requirement appears to have been neglected.<\/p>\n

The ongoing trial in Miami, before a U.S. federal court under the supervision of Judge Jacqueline Becerra, continues to reveal troubling deficiencies. The defendants \u2014 Arc\u00e1ngel Pretel Ortiz, Antonio Intriago, James Solages, and Walter Veintemilla \u2014 are accused of financing and organizing a plot to assassinate the president in pursuit of public contracts.<\/p>\n

The defense, however, argues that the Colombian commando unit was tasked only with arresting the president, claiming that he may have been killed prior to their arrival by members of the presidential security apparatus or law enforcement.<\/p>\n

A fifth defendant, Christian Emmanuel Sanon, will be tried separately due to health concerns.<\/p>\n

Between approximately 1:00 a.m. \u2014 the time of the attack \u2014 and 10:37 a.m. \u2014 when Justice of the Peace Carl Henry Destin issued his official report \u2014 a critical question remains: who truly controlled the crime scene? Who had access? Who handled the evidence?<\/p>\n

According to the official report, after the premises were sealed, Jean Laguel Civil, Vilson \u00c9loge, and Lucita Lumenes were designated as custodians. The document further states:<\/p>\n

\u201cAfterward, we appointed the aforementioned individuals as guardians of the seals [\u2026] Finally, we instructed the ambulance worker, D. Jango No\u00ebl, to remove the body [\u2026] strictly prohibiting any photographs [\u2026] We remained on site [\u2026] until 5:30 p.m.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, following the magistrate\u2019s departure, a new uncertainty emerges: who maintained control over the sealed premises?<\/p>\n

Another critical issue concerns the handling of the body: which morgue received it, and why do multiple actors claim uncertainty regarding its whereabouts prior to the autopsy?<\/p>\n

Significant ambiguity persists.<\/p>\n

Four years after the assassination, the Miami proceedings continue to raise serious concerns regarding the management of the crime scene.<\/p>\n

Testifying in court, FBI agent Martin Suarez acknowledged that no fingerprints were collected and no DNA testing was conducted.<\/p>\n

He confirmed the presence of multiple pieces of evidence \u2014 bullet impacts, blood stains near the bed, and traces possibly belonging to Martine Mo\u00efse \u2014 yet none were subjected to forensic analysis.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe did the best we could while we were at the residence, but timing was a factor,\u201d Suarez stated.<\/p>\n

Under cross-examination by defense attorney David Howard, Suarez was questioned about the absence of forensic technicians: \u201cYou were there for six hours [\u2026] and did not have time to collect evidence?\u201d His response: \u201cWe did not have time.\u201d<\/p>\n

He further indicated that his team, which arrived two days later, collected shell casings, ammunition, and a flash-bang device, but conducted no in-depth analysis and did not inspect the rear of the property.<\/p>\n

Photographs presented to the jury depict a chaotic scene, which the defense suggests may indicate staging. Suarez stated he could not confirm the original condition of the site.<\/p>\n

In summary, despite multiple visits:<\/p>\n